View Full Version : Browser Comparison: iPhone vs. Nokia N95 and N800
07-17-2007, 12:43 AM
See Competitors Video:
iPhone vs. Nokia N95 and N800
07-17-2007, 05:34 AM
The biggest problem of the iphone is the low resolution:
Most websites are designed for 800 pix width. There is usually a menu on the left and some adverts on the right, so it is still possible to read the site with a lesser resolution if you scroll horizontally or zoom.
The iPhone does not have something equivalent to the "optimized view" of the N800. This means: many sites need horizontal scrolling. This can be done with your fingers, and zooming can be done with your fingers too. Very slick - BUT: if you open a link, the zoom level is restored to its default, and you have to zoom again by hand.
This kind of zoom/scroll/zoom/scroll is very tiring and clumsy in the long run. The iphone is slick for some short and quick web session, but not for longer browsing.
07-17-2007, 06:07 AM
please consider - it is the first iPhone Design from Apple - and it is an innovation :)
Second generation iPhone for $249 in September ????
07-17-2007, 07:51 AM
:cool: I saw the phoney video test! My n800 loads web pages in less than 7 seconds
his took almost an whole minute can some tell me what was this guy
really trying to do? The only time my tablet loads as slow as his is via bluetooth
I did like the Comparison
vBulletin® v3.8.7, Copyright ©2000-2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.