maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   SailfishOS (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=52)
-   -   gcc >= 6 ? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=99699)

yurib 2017-08-13 18:35

gcc >= 6 ?
 
Hi :)
I need gcc >= 6 for sailfish os in order to try to port a program to sailfish os.

I've searched it but I've not found it, so I've compiled sources with the latest SDK (1707), but:

Code:

/opt/cross/bin/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld: /home/src1/gcc-6.4.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: re/locale-langpack/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld.mo
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Code:

/opt/cross/bin/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld: /home/src1/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: /locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld.mo
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2


Then I've tried to compiled it on jolla1, but after 30 hours:

Code:

libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.so.1" && ln -s "libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0" "libgcj_bc.so.1")
libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.so" && ln -s "libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0" "libgcj_bc.so")
libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.la" && ln -s "../libgcj_bc.la" "libgcj_bc.la" )
/dev/null:1:3: error: invalid preprocessing directive ###
 # ### BEGIN LIBTOOL TAG CONFIG: CXX
  ^~
make[3]: *** [libgcj_bc.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libjava'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libjava'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

(compilation of version 7.1 has begun 10 minutes ago, but I think it'll fail)

Any suggestions? Thanks


EDIT: for your information, compilation of version 7.1 has failed.
Code:

libcpp.a  ../libbacktrace/.libs/libbacktrace.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
(echo "@set version-GCC 7.1.0"; \
        if [ "" = "experimental" ]; \
        then echo "@set DEVELOPMENT"; \
        else echo "@clear DEVELOPMENT"; \
        fi) > gcc-vers.texiT
echo @set srcdir /home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/../.././gcc >> gcc-vers.texiT
if [ -n "(GCC) " ]; then \
          echo "@set VERSION_PACKAGE (GCC) " >> gcc-vers.texiT; \
        fi
echo "@set BUGURL @uref{https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/}" >> gcc-vers.texiT; \
        mv -f gcc-vers.texiT gcc-vers.texi
echo timestamp > gcc.pod
perl ../.././gcc/../contrib/texi2pod.pl ../.././gcc/doc/invoke.texi > gcc.pod
echo timestamp > doc/gcc.1
(pod2man --center="GNU" --release="gcc-7.1.0" --date=2017-05-02 --section=1 gcc.pod > doc/gcc.1.T$$ && \
                mv -f doc/gcc.1.T$$ doc/gcc.1) || \
                (rm -f doc/gcc.1.T$$ && exit 1)
cp doc/gcc.1 doc/g++.1
perl ../.././gcc/../contrib/texi2pod.pl -DBUGURL="@uref{https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/}" \
          < ../.././gcc/fortran/invoke.texi > gfortran.pod
echo timestamp > doc/gfortran.1
(pod2man --center="GNU" --release="gcc-7.1.0" --date=2017-05-02 --section=1 gfortran.pod > doc/gfortran.1.T$$ && \
                mv -f doc/gfortran.1.T$$ doc/gfortran.1) || \
                (rm -f doc/gfortran.1.T$$ && exit 1)
/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/xgcc -B/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/ -nostdinc -x c /dev/null -S -o /dev/null -fself-test=../.././gcc/testsuite/selftests
/dev/null:1:5: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
cc1: note: self-tests are not enabled in this build
make[3]: *** [s-selftest] Error 1
rm gfortran.pod gcc.pod
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0'
make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2


tortoisedoc 2017-08-15 06:57

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by yurib (Post 1532571)
Hi :)
I need gcc >= 6 for sailfish os in order to try to port a program to sailfish os.

I've searched it but I've not found it, so I've compiled sources with the latest SDK (1707), but:

Code:

/opt/cross/bin/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld: /home/src1/gcc-6.4.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: re/locale-langpack/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld.mo
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-6.4.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

Code:

/opt/cross/bin/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld: /home/src1/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: /locale/en_US/LC_MESSAGES/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld.mo
collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0'
make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/src1/gcc-7.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2


Then I've tried to compiled it on jolla1, but after 30 hours:

Code:

libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.so.1" && ln -s "libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0" "libgcj_bc.so.1")
libtool: link: (cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.so" && ln -s "libgcj_bc.so.1.0.0" "libgcj_bc.so")
libtool: link: ( cd ".libs" && rm -f "libgcj_bc.la" && ln -s "../libgcj_bc.la" "libgcj_bc.la" )
/dev/null:1:3: error: invalid preprocessing directive ###
 # ### BEGIN LIBTOOL TAG CONFIG: CXX
  ^~
make[3]: *** [libgcj_bc.la] Error 1
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libjava'
make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libjava'
make[1]: *** [all-target-libjava] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-6.4.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2

(compilation of version 7.1 has begun 10 minutes ago, but I think it'll fail)

Any suggestions? Thanks


EDIT: for your information, compilation of version 7.1 has failed.
Code:

libcpp.a  ../libbacktrace/.libs/libbacktrace.a ../libiberty/libiberty.a ../libdecnumber/libdecnumber.a
(echo "@set version-GCC 7.1.0"; \
        if [ "" = "experimental" ]; \
        then echo "@set DEVELOPMENT"; \
        else echo "@clear DEVELOPMENT"; \
        fi) > gcc-vers.texiT
echo @set srcdir /home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/../.././gcc >> gcc-vers.texiT
if [ -n "(GCC) " ]; then \
          echo "@set VERSION_PACKAGE (GCC) " >> gcc-vers.texiT; \
        fi
echo "@set BUGURL @uref{https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/}" >> gcc-vers.texiT; \
        mv -f gcc-vers.texiT gcc-vers.texi
echo timestamp > gcc.pod
perl ../.././gcc/../contrib/texi2pod.pl ../.././gcc/doc/invoke.texi > gcc.pod
echo timestamp > doc/gcc.1
(pod2man --center="GNU" --release="gcc-7.1.0" --date=2017-05-02 --section=1 gcc.pod > doc/gcc.1.T$$ && \
                mv -f doc/gcc.1.T$$ doc/gcc.1) || \
                (rm -f doc/gcc.1.T$$ && exit 1)
cp doc/gcc.1 doc/g++.1
perl ../.././gcc/../contrib/texi2pod.pl -DBUGURL="@uref{https://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/}" \
          < ../.././gcc/fortran/invoke.texi > gfortran.pod
echo timestamp > doc/gfortran.1
(pod2man --center="GNU" --release="gcc-7.1.0" --date=2017-05-02 --section=1 gfortran.pod > doc/gfortran.1.T$$ && \
                mv -f doc/gfortran.1.T$$ doc/gfortran.1) || \
                (rm -f doc/gfortran.1.T$$ && exit 1)
/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/xgcc -B/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc/ -nostdinc -x c /dev/null -S -o /dev/null -fself-test=../.././gcc/testsuite/selftests
/dev/null:1:5: error: expected '=', ',', ';', 'asm' or '__attribute__' before ':' token
cc1: note: self-tests are not enabled in this build
make[3]: *** [s-selftest] Error 1
rm gfortran.pod gcc.pod
make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0/host-armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/gcc'
make[2]: *** [all-stage2-gcc] Error 2
make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0'
make[1]: *** [stage2-bubble] Error 2
make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/nemo/gcc-7.1.0'
make: *** [all] Error 2


On Jolla1? Please use the MER platform SDK instead! It'll make your life alot easier.

nieldk 2017-08-15 07:31

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Probably configure options that are not good.
Take a look at a success for 5.10 here
https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1478195

marmistrz 2017-08-15 14:48

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
I asked about upgrading GCC during the last community meeting and the answer was:

For reference, minutes from relevant community meetings:

http://merproject.org/meetings/mer-m...-04-14.33.html
http://merproject.org/meetings/mer-m...-26-08.02.html

tl;dr: Jolla has its own patches, it's unknown whether they're needed at all and are kinda shifting this all onto community (that was my impression, after all).

Btw. GCC 4.x is now end of life, even in Linaro ;)

yurib 2017-08-15 18:05

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by marmistrz (Post 1532653)
I asked about upgrading GCC during the last community meeting and the answer was:

Many thanks! :)

Sadly, they want to switch on gcc5 :eek: I'm going to cry...




Quote:

Originally Posted by nieldk (Post 1532625)
Probably configure options that are not good.
Take a look at a success for 5.10 here
https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1478195

Thanks :)
I've tried your configure options but on sailfish SDK there are the same errors as before. :( I have to try on mer SDK (see below).

For your information, my configure options came from gcc4 spec file. I've downloaded source file on jolla1:
Code:

pkcon download . gcc
then I've looked in it.




Quote:

Originally Posted by tortoisedoc (Post 1532623)
On Jolla1? Please use the MER platform SDK instead! It'll make your life alot easier.

Thanks :)
but now I'm tired... I think I need holidays!

tortoisedoc 2017-08-16 09:58

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by marmistrz (Post 1532653)
I asked about upgrading GCC during the last community meeting and the answer was:

For reference, minutes from relevant community meetings:

http://merproject.org/meetings/mer-m...-04-14.33.html
http://merproject.org/meetings/mer-m...-26-08.02.html

tl;dr: Jolla has its own patches, it's unknown whether they're needed at all and are kinda shifting this all onto community (that was my impression, after all).

Btw. GCC 4.x is now end of life, even in Linaro ;)


are those patches available somewhere?

yurib 2017-08-17 14:58

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by tortoisedoc (Post 1532711)
are those patches available somewhere?

According to the chat log, here they are.

yurib 2017-08-18 21:17

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by nieldk (Post 1532625)
Probably configure options that are not good.
Take a look at a success for 5.10 here
https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?p=1478195

On Sailfish SDK, compilation has always failed, I've tried with every version of gcc. :(

rinigus 2017-09-08 17:07

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
For those interested in getting gcc 6x working, I have compiled gcc 6.4.0 at OBS. Its available at https://build.merproject.org/package...oolbox/opt-gcc . Compiler is build with options that should allow, in theory, to mix it with the current compiler on SFOS. Compiler is installed at /opt/gcc6, making it possible to have platform gcc and opt-gcc installed at the same time.

Please note that this compiler is not tested. Its early days...

I have seen issues with linking, such as absence of correct libstdc++ and glibc. For simpler programs, that was resolved either by setting LD_LIBRARY_PATH to include /opt/gcc6/lib or linking with /usr/bin/g++

Note that such packaging is not "proper", as done by system packages. It installs whole c & c++ as a one package together with all libs under /opt/gcc6

Finally, as with @yurib, I had issues with getting ARM version compiled with LTO. So, ARM version is compiled with LTO disabled. The error message was (from OBS build log)
Code:

[ 4478s] ranlib libgcc_eh.a
[ 4478s] # @multilib_dir@ is not really necessary, but sometimes it has
[ 4478s] # more uses than just a directory name.
[ 4478s] /bin/sh /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj/../libgcc/../mkinstalldirs .
[ 4478s] /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj/./gcc/xgcc -B/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj/./gcc/
... unordsf2_s.o fixsfsi_s.o floatsisf_s.o floatunsisf_s.o adddf3_s.o divdf3_s.o eqdf2_s.o gedf2_s.o ledf2_s.o muldf3_s.o negdf2_s.o subdf3_s.o unorddf2_s.o fixdfsi_s.o floatsidf_s.o floatunsidf_s.o extendsfdf2_s.o truncdfsf2_s.o enable-execute-stack_s.o unwind-arm_s.o libunwind_s.o pr-support_s.o unwind-c_s.o emutls_s.o libgcc.a -lc && rm -f ./libgcc_s.so && if [ -f ./libgcc_s.so.1 ]; then mv -f ./libgcc_s.so.1 ./libgcc_s.so.1.backup; else true; fi && mv ./libgcc_s.so.1.tmp ./libgcc_s.so.1 && (echo "/* GNU ld script"; echo "  Use the shared library, but some functions are only in"; echo "  the static library.  */"; echo "GROUP ( libgcc_s.so.1 -lgcc )" ) > ./libgcc_s.so
[ 4479s] /opt/cross/bin/armv7hl-meego-linux-gnueabi-ld: /home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj/./gcc/liblto_plugin.so: error loading plugin: PTmPTm
[ 4479s] collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status
[ 4479s] make[3]: *** [libgcc_s.so] Error 1
[ 4479s] make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj/armv7l-unknown-linux-gnueabihf/libgcc'
[ 4479s] make[2]: *** [all-stage1-target-libgcc] Error 2
[ 4479s] make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj'
[ 4479s] make[1]: *** [stage1-bubble] Error 2
[ 4479s] make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/abuild/rpmbuild/BUILD/gcc-6.4.0/obj'
[ 4479s] make: *** [all] Error 2
[ 4479s] error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jFkB2P (%build)
[ 4479s]
[ 4479s]
[ 4479s] RPM build errors:
[ 4479s]    Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.jFkB2P (%build)
[ 4482s] [ 4465.323263] SysRq : Power Off
[ 4482s] [ 4465.327031] reboot: Power down

So, there is surely room for improvement

rinigus 2017-09-10 11:02

Re: gcc >= 6 ?
 
Just to let you know - I have been using this compiler to port a rather complicated C++14 project and it seems to work nicely. There current issues are filed at https://github.com/rinigus/pkg-gcc/issues .

We are also missing README and example projects to show how can it be used.

All in all, I would suggest to try to use it and everyone is welcome to chip in by fixing the problems with gcc packaging at OBS.


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:27.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8