maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Competitors (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=4)
-   -   Boot2Gecko devices coming? (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=82570)

don_falcone 2012-02-24 17:32

Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
http://www.extremetech.com/computing...its-own-device

Another "webby" OS... oh my.

dylanemcgregor 2012-02-24 23:07

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
I'm surprised that the couple of posts on boot2gecko haven't gotten any kind of response here. For a crowd that is obviously not satisfied with the current mobile OS status quo, I'd think something like this would get a little more attention.

cincibluer6 2012-02-25 00:35

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by dylanemcgregor (Post 1169399)
I'm surprised that the couple of posts on boot2gecko haven't gotten any kind of response here. For a crowd that is obviously not satisfied with the current mobile OS status quo, I'd think something like this would get a little more attention.

True but I know a few like me are so wowed by Harmattan and its intuitive swipe interface that anything else seems a little depressing.
You wouldn't believe how many times I handle other people's phones and just want to swipe away apps, etc.

Zoxir 2012-02-25 00:39

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Let alone the whole "browser is the whole OS". What's wrong with an operating system anyway?

gerbick 2012-02-25 00:55

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by Zoxir (Post 1169420)
Let alone the whole "browser is the whole OS". What's wrong with an operating system anyway?

Honestly... I'd say a lot is wrong with an operating system on the cellphones. The level of expectations that we have here mean we'd expect nothing less than terminal, root, ssh, git, cap, ftp in a mobile OS. But that can get heavy. Can mean that the solution will require stronger/faster hardware.

But what about folks that want less? It needs to be cheap. It needs to be quick to port to and it could be web only. Does that mean that this will be a solution? No. But it's a possibility.

ChromeOS isn't doing too well, so this might not do well either. But let's see... I'm honestly curious.

switch-hitter 2012-02-25 12:54

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
If an LG smartphone running B2G actually hits the high street then I will get excited.

MartinK 2012-02-25 13:25

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 1169424)
terminal, root, ssh, git, cap, ftp in a mobile OS. But that can get heavy. Can mean that the solution will require stronger/faster hardware.

Well, all these things are no problem at even with very outdated hardware as quite a few people run SSH servers, FTP or GIT repositories on their home routers, that are much less powerful that even the N900, without any issues.

A proper GUI toolkit (Qt,EFL,..) integration (location, camera support, video playback, 3D) might be a bit more difficult to get going.

I think the issue is probably that the manufacturers don't see "us" (power-users/developers) as the target group for their devices so they don't bother to officially support all this.

On the other hand, who would like to develop applications for such a limited, locked down and everyday-unusable device (case in point - Windows Phone)? Not counting commercial developers of course. :)

switch-hitter 2012-02-27 20:21

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
It seems Mozilla have also got Telefonica (O2 in the UK) onside: http://blog.mozilla.com/blog/2012/02...-the-platform/

LG haven't done as well as they'd like in the smartphone market, hopefully an open platform and the interest of a major carrier will prove to be a real temptation for them.

Morpog 2012-04-03 15:32

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Boot2Gecko OS for Nokia N9?

http://romaxa.info/fennec/IPCEmbeddi...arm_n9.tar.bz2

lma 2012-04-03 15:49

Re: Boot2Gecko devices coming?
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by gerbick (Post 1169424)
The level of expectations that we have here mean we'd expect nothing less than terminal, root, ssh, git, cap, ftp in a mobile OS. But that can get heavy.

I submit to you that all of the above together are vastly lighter than your average twitter or facebook client, let alone an entire browser :-)

Quote:

But what about folks that want less? It needs to be cheap. It needs to be quick to port to and it could be web only. Does that mean that this will be a solution? No.
Indeed. I'm not at all excited by the concept, but its one saving grace is that Mozilla don't seem to have much vested interest in making devices that are actively hostile against their owners. Iff those devices materialise, it may be possible to do interesting stuff with them.


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:31.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8