[March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Hi all,
As Crashanddie has already said, the Q1 2010 Maemo Community Council election is closed, and the results are in. The results are now online: http://maemo.org/vote/results.php?election_id=9 Congratulations to Randall Arnold, Andrew Flegg, Attila Csipa, Javier S. Pedro, and Ryan Abel on their election, and my commiserations to the candidates who were not elected, without whom there would not have been an election. I encourage any of you so inclined to download the ballots file and reproduce the results, as Crashanddie did this morning, and post your analyses of voting patterns and other punditry here or on the community mailing list: http://maemo.org/vote/blt.php?election_id=9 Quote:
For information, there were 399 votes out of an electorate of 3485, giving a turnout of 11.45%, compared to the last election, where there were 303 votes out of an electorate of 2339, or a turnout of 12.95%. The decreased turnout percentage can be explained by the new karma formula and the N900 release, which have resulted in a larger electorate. As I mentioned on IRC, there have been at least 2 cases of elections which might have had a different result if a different counting method were chosen in the recent past - the GNOME board of directors result was quite controversial because of this, for example. Fractional transfer STV has a few nice benefits: the result is reproducible, and can be run manually. You get to vote for candidates in order of preference, so you can vote for your actual favourite candidate instead of trying to strategically vote for the candidate who might need your votes to get elected. If your favourite candidate is eliminated, the other guy will get your vote anyway in the end. We had a very very long debate on voting methods and counting methods a while back, and even held a referendum on the issue because people felt so strongly about it. STV has a huge impact. What has a small impact (but often a decisive one) is the counting method that's used to count the STV votes. If you use Borda you can get different results to fractional transfer or random transfer. In today's election, first past the post would have given the same result, since transfers went pretty evenly to Attila, JaviSPedro and andy80, but in last GNOME election: http://foundation.gnome.org/vote/res...election_id=13 Lucas Rocha went from 6th place to 3rd place with transfers, and Diego Escalante Urrelo took the last seat when starting in 8th place, inching ahead of Jorge Castro, who was 5th in 1st preference votes. Dave. |
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Voting Now Open!
Quote:
Quote:
*** The concession prize I received for my involvement in the process of this terms community council election is that the candidate I did nominate, became one of the newer faces on the council. :) Quote:
|
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
I'l echo what Dave (dneary) said. This was the most interesting run I can recall, and I believe the needs going forward will reflect that...
|
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Congratulations to all who were elected, commisserations do those who weren't. Although not eligible to vote, as I haven't been around long enough, I've watched this process with interest and have learned a lot from it and the candidiates. Hopefully I'll be around and eligible to vote in the next set.
Looking forward to the future of the maemo community :). |
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Congratulations to those that won, and to those that didn't win: don't get discouraged! Please stick around, keep being helpful and high profile, and try again next term.
As for the voter turnout, I am a bit surprised and disappointed. With more than 1100 new eligible voters, we got less than a hundred more votes? I suspect the low profile of the last council contributed to the low turnout. I'm sure quite a few new voters shrugged and said, "Why should I care? What does the Council do, anyway?" We've got a strong, vocal, and engaged council this term. I'm sure you'll be a lot more high-profile and visible. You're going to need to be. The ride from here to MeeGo sounds like it is going to be a wild one. |
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
With the risk of overgeneralizing, the N900 brought in 1100 or so voters. (Some may have joined because of other devices, but some old-time users may have left because the forums shifted focus to the N900 and Maemo 5.)
Wow, that's pretty small. Does Nokia release the N900 sales figures? I wonder if Nokia can be convinced to advertise TMO, Council, etc. in some printed pamphlet that's distributed together with the hardware. (All modulo transition to Meego, of course.) |
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Congrats for the new council. I really think this one has the potential to be the best one yet.
|
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Small voter turnout, but then again, the community *is* small. And by that I am referring to GeneralAntilles' comments from about a week ago or so. Many users, but few community members.
The coverage I did of the election got a few hundred views, whereas the interviews I did of Peter gathered a few thousand each. Numbers tell, even from some simple blog stats. EDIT - congrats to the new Council! |
Re: [March 2010 Council Election] Maemo Community Council election results
Quote:
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 16:31. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8