maemo.org - Talk

maemo.org - Talk (https://talk.maemo.org/index.php)
-   Community (https://talk.maemo.org/forumdisplay.php?f=16)
-   -   Forum swear filter is too strict (https://talk.maemo.org/showthread.php?t=93648)

javispedro 2014-08-29 11:07

Forum swear filter is too strict
 
Smart watch. Smar****ch. Smart watch.

This seems like a clbuttic mistake.

It even "fixes" URLs for you...

Could the word filter be .. adjusted a bit? I think we're all adults around here.

What is a **** either way? (yes I actually had to look it up. No need to explain, thanks).

nokiabot 2014-08-29 11:13

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
smar****ch =?? according to the word filter ?

dirkvl 2014-08-29 11:19

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
smar t-w-a-t ch

it means muff or 'girltaco'
http://www.antimoon.com/forum/t8369.htm

Estel 2014-08-29 12:05

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by javispedro (Post 1437418)
Smart watch. Smar****ch. Smart watch.

This seems like a clbuttic mistake.

It even "fixes" URLs for you...

Could the word filter be .. adjusted a bit? I think we're all adults around here.

What is a **** either way? (yes I actually had to look it up. No need to explain, thanks).

+1. the filter is just silly. BTW, it also filters some random number counts, just because it looks like obsolete's nokia's dev Id number, that wasn't meant to be shared (by some authoritative rule, not any real legal reason).

It seems like legacy of forum being managed by Reggie, who tried to be more holy than pope. As far as I'm concerned, swear filter can go away, completely - abusive language is a subject for moderators, not to mention that anyone can bypass the filter by methods presented above. Instead of trying to fix thing broken by design, let's just ditch it.

/Estel

benny1967 2014-08-29 12:42

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
OTOH, if it hadnt been for this absurd filter, I'd still don't know what a t-w-a-t is or that the word even existed. It's an nice way to learn a language. :D

Morpog 2014-08-29 13:03

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
Lets start a 30 page discussion about it.

benny1967 2014-08-29 13:43

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
Basically, I'd say the filter isn't transparent enough. They need to open source the blacklist. Be brutally honest about it.

biketool 2014-08-29 13:58

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
We can reverse engineeer the list, I will try throwing Carlin at it.

Code:

****, piss, ****, ****, cocksucker, mother****er, and tits
(edit)Niiiiice, misses 3/7 of the famous George Carlin banned words list, but always ****s up smar****ch. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Seven_dirty_words
Interestingly the words are even redacted to asterisks when you go back to edit it.

coderus 2014-08-29 14:43

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
i'm not english native speaker/reader, but i know what is tw*t stands for :D

biketool 2014-08-29 15:02

Re: Forum swear filter is too strict
 
Coderus, **** is a crude synonym to ****, both referring to a bit of female anatomy. :)


All times are GMT. The time now is 00:45.

vBulletin® Version 3.8.8