Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
It is said that the battery should be first charged before doing an update.
But what is the reason for that? Is it: 1. To prevent the device from an unfinished firmware update in case of a to low battery ir is it also 2. The OS saves the value for 100 % battery capacity somewhere and so, can't be fully loaded to 100 % again, when the update was done at 90 % battery capacity, setting the 90 % battery capacity to maximum capacity. In other words 90 % gets the new 100 % value. Is 2 possible or is battery management done without the support of the OS? |
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
I don't know the answer to this exact question, but I do know the battery management is done in software, and that if you brick the device, with a dead battery, you can not charge the battery, nor reflash the device, without an extra battery.
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
The case here is 1, and the battery info (full charge etc) is stored in a chip in the battery AFAIK
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
That seems to make the most sense as well, or things could get really crazy with multiple batteries.
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
The average required battery capacity is anything more than 50% for flashing the firmware.
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
Number 1, that's why it is recommended to calibrate the battery at least one time per month.
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
If the battery meter is like on N8x0, then it's not very accurate except with a fresh battery. Basically, if you charge it to full you'll know it's full.
|
Re: Is it ok to updating the firmware @ 90% of battery capacity?
Thank's a lot for answering my question.
|
All times are GMT. The time now is 23:19. |
vBulletin® Version 3.8.8