View Single Post
Posts: 27 | Thanked: 22 times | Joined on May 2011
#6
Originally Posted by wicket View Post
Hmmm, that email looks remarkably similar to the one I wrote to them here.

Anyway, here is the reponse I got when I pointed out that the Beta 3 kernel source doesn't match the PR1.1 kernel source.
Yes, that was the source of my mail. Just wanted to put in some added pressure to ensure action . Thanks for starting it though.