View Single Post
Posts: 3,464 | Thanked: 5,107 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Gothenburg in Sweden
#3
Originally Posted by specc View Post
The N8 and 808 runs Symbian. Symbian existed long before Nokia set it's floppy fingers into it. It was used on Sony Ericsson, Samsung and Motorola smartphones for many years. It is only a couple of years ago since Nokia bought all of Symbian.

So yes, the Lumia 800 is just as much "Nokia proper" (or not) as the 808 and N8 is or isn't.

Following your logics, none of the Galaxys are Samsung Proper. None of the Xperias are Sony(Ericsson) proper, none of ... and so on. You are talking nonsense.
My poiunt is:

N8, 808 and N9 is running QT. N9 has better camera tha Lumia 800. N8 has better camera than N9.

Lumia **** device does not have better camera than any of above and does not have QT.

So what has it that is RELATED to any of above!?

Its just shitty marketing strategy to made people THINK its related and they may think: "I dont have money to buy 808 I better go for that Lumia device instead it probadly not as good camera as 808 but atleast goiod enought" when fact is its less god than N9.

Atleast N9 should be on the list too!