View Single Post
Posts: 136 | Thanked: 142 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ @
#471
Originally Posted by jalyst View Post
That's not right....
The L800 was largely contracted out, it's well known that the N9 was far more "in house" than the L800*, that slowly changed with the 900, & is probably very different with the 920 now.
You have variations in housing quality (which includes colouring/coating among other things), some white housings will look better than others, it's the nature of mass production.
It MAY be possible that "whiter" housings & better glass fronts are being reserved for the L800's etc, but generally production doesn't work like that, too inefficient...
More likely is that because we've had much greater no's of them being produced for much longer now, the probability of having better quality builds** in circulation has become higher.

*This was done because Nokia didn't have the capacity for qualcomm related tech at the time, so in order to get to market quicker, most of the work was contracted out, because of the specialised (stop-gap) design of the L800, that wouldn't have changed since.
**at least in SOME aspects.....
Thanks for the info. I compared my N9 to the 900 and 920. About the production quality, I said I wasn't sure but I remember reading comparisons between the N9 and 800. Some people said they felt their 800's were better built. I don't think that all were better since there are always errors in production.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to TheN9er For This Useful Post: