Thread
:
[Council] Should Tech Staff and/or Council Remove Dangerous Packages From Extras and Extras-Testing?
View Single Post
Estel
2013-03-29 , 20:03
Posts: 5,028 | Thanked: 8,613 times | Joined on Mar 2011
#
9
sixwheeledbeast
, you're last person, that I would expect to have bad will, when it comes to testing packages.
Nevertheless, I think that it would be more fair to re-define rules for packages (what can't be in repos and why), announce them, and give maintainers 2-3 weeks for fixing. Then, start mercilessly executing those rules, be it against *patch or any other super-popular and respected package.
This way, it should be fair for everyone, without any sneaking suspicions about anyone being biased against anything.
/Estel
// Edit
And yes, I'm kinda playing
advocatus diaboli
here - I think that the more clear rules applying to *everyone* we will setup now (and tweak, if experience taught us about need to), the better future will be
__________________
N900's aluminum backcover / body replacement
-
N900's HDMI-Out
-
Camera cover
MOD
-
Measure battery's real capacity on-device
-
TrueCrypt 7.1
|
ereswap
|
bnf
-
Hardware's mods research is costly. To support my work, please consider donating. Thank You!
Last edited by Estel; 2013-03-29 at
20:06
.
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to Estel For This Useful Post:
pichlo
,
tzsm98
,
Wikiwide
Estel
View Public Profile
Send a private message to Estel
Find all posts by Estel