View Single Post
misterc's Avatar
Posts: 1,625 | Thanked: 998 times | Joined on Aug 2010
#692
Originally Posted by MartinK View Post
Which could be translated to "we are too lazy to make a proper public API, so we just mashed up an Android app and called it a day". But yeah, this is still a real concern and IMHO a valid argument for having some sort of Android emulation available.
yeah, public API...
well, who is interested in a public API?
developers?
as a matter of fact there are usually a lot of apps for a single organisation, many of which created by 3rd parties, either with commercial intend or "freely" (or as adware)
either way, there has to be some API available.
but at the end of the day, the vast majority of users just want an app which not only shows them information but also allows them to interact, like planning a trip or even booking it...
and there, the number of devices running on an OS obviously matters.
if i would develop (& maintain) myself all the apps i found in a few hrs for Android, i could be busy full time.
only, the number of ppl interested in using it, leave alone paying for it would be so small, it simply never would allow for a living
alas

unbelievable that from the most used (& sold) platform three years ago, NOKIA went to oblivion because of one m0##0n
flop deserves to be cut in pieces and fed to the porks
__________________
information is a necessary though no sufficient condition to rationality...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to misterc For This Useful Post: