Not that it should be able to do anything, that we couldn't *if* Neo900 appears - maybe quazar could do some things faster, *if* they're going to use some specialized-for-encryptions CPU additions.

But, frankly that part about, "secure storage in the cloud" - what are they smoking? If they're doing product for secure-freaks, they shouldn't use such "snake oil" terms, as it makes them look less professional in eyes of potential customers.

When your data is on some funny server you don't control, somewhere on the net, it is *never* secure. Anytime, gov. guys may demand access, and you will never know it. Not to mention secret, but mandatory backdoors (germany and USA anonymizers, anyone?).

/Estel