Who defined including whole maemo garage electorate as being mandatory?
...usually it's council that suggests what to do and HiFo has no power over council and community and usually is supposed to execute what THE COMMUNITY (represented by council) asks for (unless illegal).
The Board of Directors executes the Council's and General Assembly's rulings.
Why does any e.V need to abolish that
and instead have an unelected group of privileged members called GA, appointed (or rejected!!!)
by some unelected...
self-appointed entity inside the e.V. which are deciding
instead of THE MAEMO COMMUNITY?
I don't see why any e.V cannot act exactly like the HiFo concept we publicly discussed and agreed upon.
You need a GA?
fine! have a 6 members that are authorized by elections forming that GA,
and make them promise to always listen to THE MAEMO COMMUNITY and not start own activity abusing their privileged position.
after all they are supposed to be members of the community and not elected to be the (lifetime) emperors of (the huge discriminated rest of) community.
This is where discrimination and abolishing/killing of the original maemo community starts.
...when you want to turn a FOSS community of (depending on the way you count) ~6000 to ~100,000 members into a club of a few dozen appointed by a governing entity, paying membership fees, not concerned about their anonymity, members of a club.
I will not contribute and participate any further... blabla... BR Bye maemo jOERG (a last time with councilor signature, though as a sort of minority report since other council members like to disagree on most of my concerns)