View Single Post
Posts: 2,076 | Thanked: 3,268 times | Joined on Feb 2011
#3
Originally Posted by ZogG View Post
Though i think transparency is the future, i do think that some things should be left private, even though i found out that i was the topic of some discussions. After you can't please everyone and somethings would hijacked by dealing with who said what to whom, after all we are all human and we have some talking behind back and so on. The problem is if it changes the point view of moderator or not. And as it's not and keeps him still most objective as he can, i don't mind of some private "only staff" discussions.
Not mod logs of private emails, mod logs of actions:

x post was deleted for reason y
z was deleted as spam
z was deleted as spam
z was deleted as spam
etc

(the amount of detail is to be discussed, mask the mod names to prevent witch hunts, sure, but also edits should include if they edited russia out of the post, or US, or spain, or finland...)
edit: also added clarification to the first post, this is not about opening inboxes, log of modifications to the forum posts

Last edited by szopin; 2015-06-02 at 21:15.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to szopin For This Useful Post: