I never said they were invalid. I find the repetitiveness unnecessary because it will do nothing more than say the very same thing over and over - a fact that we already know "I've not received my tablet. I'm disappointed by this news. I had high hopes that my money was well-spent and I am unhappy."

But to use angry words, legalese and other rhetoric... what does it resolve? Show the world you're upset?

Consider that job very well done.

You have your stance. I have mine. In the end, we all want the same thing. I'd just rather avoid raising my blood pressure over something as impermanent as a tablet or over something I cannot control, Jolla's business standing. That's what I consider healthy.