View Single Post
kinggo's Avatar
Posts: 943 | Thanked: 3,228 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ Zagreb
#2567
Originally Posted by lantern View Post
Because it's not. It's a low-mid range phone, whereas X was almost top of the line.
Specs are almost the same. So I don't understand what clovis86 is so excited about.
sure, if we are talking about price. It was just an overpriced midranger. Even X Performance was quite behind other flagships.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to kinggo For This Useful Post: