View Single Post
Posts: 1,873 | Thanked: 4,529 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ North Potomac MD
#6170
Originally Posted by pichlo View Post
There is no stationary frame. Only a lot of different frames moving relatively to each other. An observer may consider his own frame "stationary" but that is only an illusion.
.
.
This is the same as what I am inferring. There no absolute "stationary" reference frame. I'm just talking about the observer that is making a measurement and thinks they are not moving. I probably should not have said moving reference frame but just said moving relative to observer. Sorry if I confused folks. My physics is kind of rusty!

EDIT: Good job pichlo. You're the best too!