View Single Post
olf's Avatar
Posts: 304 | Thanked: 1,246 times | Joined on Aug 2015
#2674
Originally Posted by Amboss View Post
Yes, sorry. I tend to post confusing questions.
[...]
And third: Why is it still called beta. Is it considered less stable than PM2?
Nobody really knows (presumably including @coderus), as Patchmanager 3 lacks testers carrying out proper tests with a focus on reproducibility and providing comprehensive feedback / bug reports beyond "it does not work".

E.g. take a look at PM's issue tracker and you will realise that only very few ever provided proper feedback.

And while properly filed complaints ("issue reports") have been quite rare, @coderus never received any code contribution ("Pull Request") for Patchmanager 3, AFAICS.

So if you want speed up the development of PM3, do something besides asking / complaining!

P.S.: For me recent PM3 versions are behaving "better" than the last PM2, but YMMV.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to olf For This Useful Post: