View Single Post
Posts: 986 | Thanked: 1,526 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#653
Originally Posted by spag View Post
That is a bold statement, unless you consider rebranduing existing apps and services "developing".
this is quite true, but also kind of the point of purism. they still deserve the credit, for being ABLE to re-use FOSS apps, which requires hw+sw effort and huge corporate sacrifices. in the end, all that matters is how good the app is on the phone they deliver. (evidence points to SFOS apps being WAY better at this point, in librem5s infancy, but that could change)

on a side note, as for rebranding FOSS apps and charging money for them and related services, this is FANTASTIC. if they are actually selling Librem One subscriptions, this is something to be celebrated. whenever anyone pays money for FOSS software, the world is a slightly better place
__________________
~ teleshoes ~
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to wolke For This Useful Post: