Let's keep the namecalling!
[...] Sure, you're not the first one to call me troll
(not the first one to retract, either), [...]
I still think it is an absurd argument: I don't know of anyone else doing it that way, and it leads to a conclusion that directly contradicts the GPLv3 FAQ itself, in addition to other, more absurd conclusions (e.g. , why would the Affero clause be needed if mere "users" of the work are already entitled to the source?).
You prefixed it with "Dutch", as if hinting that it was a story that really happened in this world.
And you mentioned other examples (such as the GPLv3 being incompatible with ATMs because, according to you, users of the ATM would be entitled to the encryption keys of the machine, apparently), which are even more far-fetched, and that I didn't pursue.