View Single Post
Fargus's Avatar
Posts: 1,217 | Thanked: 446 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Bedfordshire, UK
#28
Originally Posted by daperl View Post
You are a pedant; you should work on that. No where in my post did I say how unique or robust my solution was. In fact, I called it a hack. The OP mentioned Python and MAC address; I gave him one possible solution from a similar device. Then you inaccurately responded and I corrected you. And now you're making excuses for your inaccuracies with bad, pedantic scoping rules humor. You'll do well here.

Welcome to talk.maemo.org!
Actually I wasn't referring to that post at all - I was referring to the one where you inserted the word GSM in the middle of the post I had made regarding identification of a device. Now, we can argue semantics all month if you wish but I would have thought that made your original posting pedant too.

talk about off the plot!


Original Post by you:

daperl 6th Nov 2009 , 09:47 PM
Posts: 988 | Thanked: 563 times | Joined on Dec 2007 Report This | #6

Originally Posted by Fargus
Should therefore work as unique number for any GSM device.

Last edited by Fargus; 2009-11-09 at 19:42.