View Single Post
javispedro's Avatar
Posts: 2,355 | Thanked: 5,249 times | Joined on Jan 2009 @ Barcelona
#20
Originally Posted by Master of Gizmo View Post
Hightlight 2 imho has nothing to do with this. It imho only sais that nokia/intel do not have to provide any guarantee on the parts the hacker modified. Still as of highlight 1 they must not add artifical limitations to the part the hacker did not touch.
Because I see DRMd files as downloaded (a "service" provided for a work "that has been modified by the client" -> no requirement). If anything, this forbids them to disallow you to access your already bought DRMd songs, but allows them to prevent you buying any new DRMd song. (Stuff gets more weirder when you think that a DRM might be implemented as a quick ping to an online server every time you try to play a "protected" material... god save us).

Clearly, this last clause is designed to help prevent cheaters from entering a multiplayer network (or stuff like that), but I see no difference between that and preventing freeloaders from entering a paid content network.

Last edited by javispedro; 2010-04-05 at 17:33.