View Single Post
Posts: 156 | Thanked: 90 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#2
20% more standby time? Bigger root size? Roughly same speeds? Less CPU intensive? Seriously? Nokia's rootfs decision @ N900 = FAIL

I think that 256MB OneNAND chip should've been used for swap and 32GB eMMC for system + home + files. Oh, we can still do (fix) that

And of course ext3 should've been everywhere, but let's not get into that...
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to rooted For This Useful Post: