View Single Post
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#297
Originally Posted by bsving View Post
Intel is doing the "right" thing in terms of license, when looking at the "moral" side of it. They aren't doing anything wrong, and certainly will not get into any trouble. When looking from a distro point of view, they are not doing anything "wrong" either, but very little good also. The open source community will benefit very little from Meego, the only thing being the WM.
Huh ? What ? MeeGo has an upstream-first policy, implying that it does not want to maintain versions of it's own - it wants to contribute everything to the source projects - you just can't get more beneficial to the community (naturally, with the presumption that upstream-first is not just lip-service).

The point here is that there are no legal implications or licensing implications of any kind when using closed drivers that are made public by the vendors. None whatsoever. It is only a problem that exists in some open source nazis heads. Meego is not meant to be a distro in the normal sense, but is meant for OEM, and they will include closed drivers. Not only drivers, but lots of other closed things as well.
Sorry, but this is just rubbish. It is not OEM in the sense that the Intel drivers ARE there. If Nokia or anybody else decided to make an Intel based platform, there would be no evil blobs to be included, that would be your base. And as for nazis... let me put on the danramos hat - after the 770, N800 and N810 (and N900), there is just no way you can say binary blob drivers are okay. No. Sorry. You just can't. If someone gets to be called a nazi because he doesn't want to get stuck with one OS version because of the kernel and driver version/config, something is very, very wrong.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc