View Single Post
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#3
Originally Posted by richwhite View Post
I've always said that. When you only supply hardware and rely on others for software you're placing your whole business on someone else's longevity and success. Nokia have always had the right idea by being the pioneers over followers; Samsung and Motorola only popped back into the market through Android and there's no real discernible difference between any of them. They lose their brand identity and it becomes a game of who has the best implementaton of Android.
Well in the long run it becomes "who has the best implementation of MeeGo" instead, so the better question is what can they do to prevent themselves from becoming commoditized, which at least in the US only benefits the carriers.

The answer, of course, is branding of their devices, stores, and services. This is likely to be a bigger reason Android will face pressure from the handset vendors themselves (and hopefully the carriers too) as it essentially puts all of that in Google's court instead of their own. MeeGo (or indeed, any open source effort not wholly owned by one vendor) fills the platform niche nicely, putting Google out of the picture.

Now we just sit back and watch what happens, and hope that us end-users don't end up as collateral damage :/
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to wmarone For This Useful Post: