View Single Post
Jaffa's Avatar
Posts: 2,535 | Thanked: 6,681 times | Joined on Mar 2008 @ UK
#17
Originally Posted by klinglerware View Post
I think it shows the community that there is a commitment to stick to previously agreed-upon mechanisms, even at a time when the community is perceived to be in flux.

This is not to say that the "rules" can't be changed, but it is better to discuss those after the fact, rather than in the midst of the process.
The rules are absolutely clear on the fact: there is no need for an election if there are five candidates. There is no diversion from the "previous agreed-upon mechanisms".

Having an election with low turnout could be more harmful.
__________________
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: