View Single Post
pichlo's Avatar
Posts: 6,445 | Thanked: 20,981 times | Joined on Sep 2012 @ UK
#133
Originally Posted by lantern View Post
when you say 2:1 you have to calculate to understand how it is different to 16:9, whereas 18:9 tells you which dimension became bigger comparing to usual ratio.
That sounds like marketing language again. It is a damn legth ratio, nothing more. One side is twice as long as the other. Simple. If anything forces me to calculate anything, then it is presenting it like 18:9 or 1486:743. Why should I care how different is it from anything?

But OK, let's assume it matters. Then why not 16:8?

But I see I am fighting an uphill battle. The damage has already been done. If the population at large really sees it like the quote above, then there is no chance. We are all doomed. And we deserved it.
__________________
Русский военный корабль, иди нахуй!
 

The Following 7 Users Say Thank You to pichlo For This Useful Post: