View Single Post
Posts: 81 | Thanked: 114 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#16
Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
This is incorrect. Revision 7 of the ByLaws (which is the last revision posted here on the forum, and officially voted in), Section IV, paragraph 6 reads:
Excellent. At least he worked out the obstructions before he played the game.


Originally Posted by woody14619 View Post
Not quite. In my accepting the position, assuming the appointment is valid, currently there are at least two Directors. Until Jim's public announcement of his acceptance, we both have an equal vote. Meaning for anything to move forward, we must both agree on it, as a conflict will result in deadlock.
And what happens if Jim refuses the appointment, or simply doesn't bother responding? Will there be an election, or will it be more "well, we're having one later anyway, so we'll just sit here for now."



Originally Posted by Dave999 View Post
Time for you to drop your conspiracy hat. Are you running for one of the spots or what?
Nope! But this isn't the first time we've seen SD69 ruin things. Or are we not allowed to talk about NDAs?