View Single Post
Posts: 1,289 | Thanked: 4,316 times | Joined on Oct 2014
#13
Originally Posted by jellyroll View Post
I don't understand PayPal policies. Why would you interfere with your customers transfers as a 'banking' company? Are all consumers now days real human hybrids donkeys? Gold digging will never stop, I think the Neo team needs a investment company.
Simply because of Risk.
An aquirer will get fined from MC/Visa et al for many reasons. Way to many to name here. But the fines can be as large as milliond/month.
Which is why PP is their own aquirer. Nobody wanted to be that for them, because of the risk.
Believe me, PPs terms are far less restrictive compared to the usual aquirers.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: