It's not about what *I* like to read, it's about general usefulnes of posts. In context: an argument is usually to make a point, a means to an end, I don't see any point being made by counting up sales prices of a number of random articles to a total that happens to be close to what's recent Neo900 sales price estimation. Tell me what shall be my conclusion from it and how I can change what I do based on it, and I'll admit that my call was odd. Or is the pupose of such statements to inform other prospects what they could get for a 1200 bucks? Then I have a remark: new N900 are not available anymore and when they were, they - if I remember correctly - were priced at 599EUR direct factory sales, so maybe the math above is not even correct.

BR
jOERG