View Single Post
Posts: 3,074 | Thanked: 12,960 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Sofia,Bulgaria
#117
Originally Posted by int_ua View Post
Yeah, I know... *sad* What is faster: thumb+430973 or nothumb+no430973?
Maybe I will finally try running KP on this weekend...
TBH I don't find any speed difference between KP49 and KP50. This means that either errata workaround does not work on n900(and KP) or it has no visible effect on the speed.

To return OT - there is just no way you can stably run Ubuntu thumb-compiled binaries on n900 without errata workaround 430973 enabled in kernel. Still don't know if it is enough though.

Last edited by freemangordon; 2012-03-26 at 23:01.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to freemangordon For This Useful Post: