Thread: How is btrfs meant to be used?
View Single Post
nieldk is offline nieldk
2015-07-14 , 08:47
Posts: 1,290 | Thanked: 4,319 times | Joined on Oct 2014
#7
Originally Posted by juiceme View Post
Actually BTRFS was a good choise and made sense when it was decided to be used. (and still does) BTRFS has good feature set that is used and needed on the device and is optimized to minimize FLASH wear.
I dont see how running btrfs balance every night helps
I disagree with you hehe

Originally Posted by juiceme View Post
The real problem is users cramming too much data on the device, so the more sensible choise would have been having the device with 64GB storage in the first place...
Oh yeah! I do that :P
And +1 for more memory


Originally Posted by juiceme View Post
Totally different thing, Aegis was meant to be a barrier for users, whereas Jolla choise of FS is a blessing for you
Yes, different thing, same issue. Cant get rid of it easily
__________________
You can still support my work by donation - click here
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to nieldk For This Useful Post: