View Single Post
Moderator | Posts: 5,320 | Thanked: 4,464 times | Joined on Oct 2009
#31
Originally Posted by qwazix View Post
jalyst, we will benefit from more candidates either way. So if you have someone in mind pester him via mail, pm, pigeon, message-in-bottle and smoke signals, you have about 15h to force him to accept
Yes, but the idea is to leverage the maemo infra in order to send out a much larger smoke signal
That's assuming the balance of nominees -as its stands- it too skewed one way or the other.

btw, why don't you run?
I doubt very much I have the right skill-set, & even if I did I doubt I'd be terribly effectual, as I just wouldn't put enough time into it.
Plus I wouldn't ever nominate, unless I was "absolutely sure" I could be effectual...

Originally Posted by thedead1440 View Post
I had brought this topic up at the beginning of the current Council's term
At that time I was told that moderators who are also members of Council/BoD won't be moderating threads related to Council/BoD during their term.
If required, I personally have no issues with giving up my moderator rights if elected to Council for the term I serve in Council
Glad to hear you say that, personally, I think that's the most righteous thing to do...
But as someone suggested & as a compromise, perhaps only remove mod rights to the community sub-forum (I dont know how well that would work in practice, I have my doubts)
Even better than that, would be to find someone else to step into your moderator role.
You've got heaps of time between now & when the results are in to do that, & it wouldn't matter if that search was still going whist you are in Council, so long as it didn't drag on.

Last edited by jalyst; 2013-04-23 at 07:10.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to jalyst For This Useful Post: