View Single Post
Posts: 3,328 | Thanked: 4,476 times | Joined on May 2011 @ Poland
#637
Originally Posted by DrYak View Post
- Lots of 3rd party apps are "noarch" anyway (QML + Javascript, mostly - same package regardless of the CPU arch).

- Supporting Aarch64 is basically just adding 1 more available target on their OpenBuildSystem compile farm.

- We need multiple archs due to Atom's 486/IA32 anyway

- There aren't that many 3rd party apps with binary code anyway, compared to Android or iOS. Lots of them are opensource and even if the original author is unavailable, someone else could easily fork the repo and recompile.
Only the few closed-source apps, with a binary component, whose dev is unavailable, and that will need a Aarch64 recompile would be affacted by the switch.
When I was discussing the GCC update during one of the Mer meetings, Jolla seemed most concerned about those closed-source applications.
__________________
If you want to support my work, you can donate by PayPal or Flattr

Projects no longer actively developed: here
 

The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to marmistrz For This Useful Post: