Thread: Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
View Single Post
sulu is offline sulu
2013-12-16 , 23:11
Posts: 915 | Thanked: 3,209 times | Joined on Jan 2011 @ Germany
#1517
Originally Posted by viktor80 View Post
this level of privacy security is unnecessary for a normal user. Or the struggle to reach it. I know there is a big fuss around this topic but it feels like overreaction for me.

Its just my toughts about it, i am more interested in a working device with sane amount of secure privacy than perfect privacy on papers/plans.
From what I understand implementing the super-paranoid privacy features (with considering modem a black box) is trivial compared to the difficulties of sourcing the missing parts and proper technical hardware testing.
So iff all the parts can be sourced and the HW design will reach its final stages privacy will pretty much just be icing on the cake.

I, for one like sweets, but nothing will stop you from using your Neo900 for automated GPS-based facebook status updates every few seconds.

After having written this the fact that Google and Apple will not grant you that super-paranoid privacy which wouldn't cost them any extra money makes me even more paranoid.
 

The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to sulu For This Useful Post: