Thread
:
Neo900 - finally a successor of N900
View Single Post
qwazix
2013-12-16 , 22:18
Moderator | Posts: 2,622 | Thanked: 5,447 times | Joined on Jan 2010
#
1513
My take is that Neo900 team and FSF are speaking different languages regarding the last point. Neo900 team proposes something that would provide the best possible privacy, while the FSF, to endorse anything requires all the software to be free. I think we are in a situation that the FSF really likes the project, wants to endorse it, and is trying to find a loophole in it's own guidelines to do so.
By christening the modem "circuit" it doesn't make the problem any less, it just moves the problem out of the jurisdiction of the FSF and into that of one imaginary FHF.
If there is another, saner way to actually be compliant with the FSF guidelines and at the same time ensure decent privacy, IMO it would benefit both parties.
__________________
Proud coding competition 2012 winner:
ρcam
My other apps:
speedcrunch
N9
N900
Jolla
––
contactlaunch
––
timenow
Nemo UX blog:
Grog
My website:
qwazix.com
My job:
oob
Last edited by qwazix; 2013-12-16 at
22:21
.
Quote & Reply
|
The Following 13 Users Say Thank You to qwazix For This Useful Post:
cproc
,
dos1
,
Estel
,
foobar
,
fw190
,
javispedro
,
joerg_rw
,
michaaa62
,
OVK
,
peterleinchen
,
pichlo
,
taixzo
,
wicket
qwazix
View Public Profile
Send a private message to qwazix
Find all posts by qwazix