That's absolutely irrelevant to the conversation. We're commenting on Nokia's failure to delivery promised updates and software. Similarly, I could say that I've used Adobe Flash 10.3 on my Android devices (ALL of them) quite some times... not MY problem that people can't leave their N900 to get more secure and up-to-date software. Why not? It's true. Hell, my Motorola Droid (original) is still getting Adobe Flash updates EVEN with the current stock firmware--and that came out at about the same time as the N900. My Galaxy Tab is nearing a year soon--still getting updated software. Even the Color Nook gets updated Flash--and that's a freaking eReader tablet produced by a mere BOOKSTORE chain. Would you like me to take screenshots to show you which versions of Flash I'm running on my devices? ...or I can just type them to you if you'd like. What kind of support did Nokia promise along the way with each of these devices? What kind of support did they deliver? From what I saw, they over-promised each time.. and drastically under-delivered. Why are you so afraid of the mere mention of better support elsewhere? It's ponderous how much fear you're displaying--granted, you have to move off of Nokia to get something with better support these days, but you seem overly fearful of the mere mention. Getting back to the original point: I wouldn't buy anything from Nokia based on promised features, software or updates. Buy it ONLY if it delivers what you want at the time it's released because anything afterwards is just lucky bonuses, based on their history.