Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5
Reply
Thread Tools
tissot's Avatar
tissot is offline tissot
2010-09-10 , 15:05
Posts: 1,839 | Thanked: 2,432 times | Joined on May 2009
#41
N900 was not best specced that's for sure at it's time.
Thought i have to agree that what does WM6.5 equipped HD2 have anything to do with the topic?

I got Galaxy S as my daily phone, but still use N900 daily. I usually buy device i want, not the spec list.
 
egoshin is offline egoshin
2010-09-10 , 20:35
Posts: 992 | Thanked: 995 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ California
#42
Originally Posted by imperiallight View Post
Lets see from memory of having both devices...

HD2 specs vs N900 specs

* Thinnest device for its screen size to date vs fattest phone created in last three years, qwerty or otherwise (well I haven't checked but I am probably right)
* Compass vs no compass
* 576 Mb Ram vs 256 MB Ram
* Steel/Carbon fibre construction vs some kind of plastic
* 1ghz CPU overclockable to 1.3GHZ vs 600Mhz overclockable to 1.1 Ghz (well some devices anyway)
* Capacitative mutitouch vs resistive screen (don't add your prehistoric views when every phone is headed this way, I bet you were the same with touchscreens)
*USB host vs no USB host
*157 grams vs 181 grams
* Scratch resistant screen vs easy scratch screen
* Sturdy USB port build vs Falling out USB port issue
* 4.3" screen vs 3.5" screen (and its meant to be a tablet)
Memory is micro SD upgradeable but one area its beaten
no KBD vs KBD
no TV out vs HDMI
no 1GB flash vs 32GB eMMC

... yes, your comparison is biased.
 
Reply
Page 5 of 5 « First 34 5

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 21:54.

Contact Us - Home - Archive - Top