|
2010-10-26
, 04:22
|
Posts: 1,746 |
Thanked: 2,100 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#2
|
Are these card-like hard discs known for beeing slow? No matter if yes or no, there should be a way to make the kernel keep some ressources back when writing so that the device does respond as usual.
|
2010-10-26
, 06:00
|
Posts: 69 |
Thanked: 55 times |
Joined on Nov 2009
|
#3
|
|
2010-10-26
, 06:59
|
Posts: 1,425 |
Thanked: 983 times |
Joined on May 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#4
|
|
2010-10-26
, 07:15
|
Posts: 2,829 |
Thanked: 1,459 times |
Joined on Dec 2009
@ Finland
|
#5
|
|
2010-10-26
, 07:40
|
Posts: 540 |
Thanked: 288 times |
Joined on Sep 2009
|
#6
|
|
2010-10-26
, 09:15
|
Posts: 196 |
Thanked: 224 times |
Joined on Sep 2010
@ Africa
|
#7
|
why is the disk i/o performance that bad?
Everytime I install something from the repos or I transfer files via USB or bluetooth the whole device lags. And yes, I'm pretty sure there's no special case with my device, I had some others to compare. Can't really believe why it seems like I'm the first in here that is going nuts of this bottleneck? I don't know much about the card the N900 uses as disc (what is it? mmc? ssd? microsd? lsd?) so could someone please explain how this can happen?
Are these card-like hard discs known for beeing slow? No matter if yes or no, there should be a way to make the kernel keep some ressources back when writing so that the device does respond as usual. I'm going to have a look at it, but I'm stil interested in your opinions or hints.
Greets