|
2009-10-09
, 04:50
|
|
Posts: 3,811 |
Thanked: 1,151 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ East Lansing, MI
|
#2
|
|
2009-10-09
, 06:29
|
|
Posts: 2,142 |
Thanked: 2,054 times |
Joined on Dec 2006
@ Sicily
|
#3
|
|
2009-10-09
, 07:01
|
|
Posts: 3,811 |
Thanked: 1,151 times |
Joined on Oct 2007
@ East Lansing, MI
|
#4
|
However, I uploaded them to Google Docs, and opened them with the Tear browser. It was at least 4x as fast as native performance.
I was wondering, why is this, and if anyone else has experienced this. Are Google's servers compressing the data (a good thing). It completely baffles me that Tear and Docs is faster than all the native readers. Its actually better on Google Docs, because I don't have to sync, but I am just curious as to why.
----------------------------------------------------
www.ezschool.com - The best online educational experience.