Active Topics

 


Poll: Delet the values from the speedpatch?
Poll Options
Delet the values from the speedpatch?

Reply
Thread Tools
Dark_Angel85's Avatar
Posts: 519 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Malaysia
#431
Originally Posted by epitaph View Post
This is a very personal view not based on facts. If it's faster then it's faster.
True. To ME, that's important. Sorry.

Don't flame me though. I'm just giving my PERSONAL feedback. That's all.
__________________
[N900]
1000min 1000max @ ulv
PR1.3 with CSSU latest update
Malaysian N900 user!!!

Last edited by Dark_Angel85; 2011-06-28 at 14:46.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Dark_Angel85 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 118 | Thanked: 15 times | Joined on Jul 2010
#432
hi ~ can you put the details in your first post, what value should deleted from the patch ?
i am totally out of the circle now...
 
Dark_Angel85's Avatar
Posts: 519 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Malaysia
#433
Originally Posted by locolyric View Post
hi ~ can you put the details in your first post, what value should deleted from the patch ?
i am totally out of the circle now...
just download the speedpatch.tar.gz again and follow the instructions in the first post as if installing a new update
__________________
[N900]
1000min 1000max @ ulv
PR1.3 with CSSU latest update
Malaysian N900 user!!!
 
Dark_Angel85's Avatar
Posts: 519 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Malaysia
#434
Originally Posted by epitaph View Post
I don't flame you. Maybe you need some more time? It's not very logic your argument of authority.
true... i maybe needed more time... i wasn't trying to argue as well. just saying what i was experiencing. i'm not saying even that your code was bad. cause i'm not sure if your codes were causing it... just said that the previous experience was better. just stating EXACTLY how i felt using the phone...

... but indeed i could have given it more time...

... if i were a little bit more patient
__________________
[N900]
1000min 1000max @ ulv
PR1.3 with CSSU latest update
Malaysian N900 user!!!
 
Dark_Angel85's Avatar
Posts: 519 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Malaysia
#435
not even arguing. just stating my experience using it. i'm sure that's ok right? not even saying which code causing it to slow down cause i don't know. just saying that using the device with the new patch caused some lag issues.
__________________
[N900]
1000min 1000max @ ulv
PR1.3 with CSSU latest update
Malaysian N900 user!!!
 
Posts: 195 | Thanked: 96 times | Joined on May 2011
#436
sry epitaph
but not with me
after i reapplied the new patch (the without values) i got a more responsive N900
maybe the values are useful but idk with what

anyway it looks like stable again
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Seker_94 For This Useful Post:
Posts: 195 | Thanked: 96 times | Joined on May 2011
#437
Hmm sry again then
 
cutehunk04's Avatar
Posts: 472 | Thanked: 195 times | Joined on Jun 2010 @ India, Mumbai
#438
had installed it..but need to say after installing it..my battery power decreased like anything...last night after i installed i put my n900 in silent mode and slept and the batter showed about 79% in morning about 7am...my cell was found switch off because of the battery...so i am removing it...
__________________
Knowledge is knowing a tomato is a fruit; Wisdom is not putting it in a fruit salad
 
Posts: 182 | Thanked: 40 times | Joined on Apr 2010 @ Seatle, WA
#439
@epipath having a faster browser but unresponsive system is not what I want. Your values might increase browser benchmark at the expense of eating some other processes and reducing the multitasking.

I am not going to play around with the params as already ohmd is taking care of putting memory allocation for back ground processes. I believe putting this values is making cgroup of ohmd work (though I doubt that nokia engineers would have ignored this).

I would anyday prefer better multitasking compared to increase in browser processing javascript in some lesser milliseconds.
 

The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to mehulrajput For This Useful Post:
Dark_Angel85's Avatar
Posts: 519 | Thanked: 123 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Malaysia
#440
Originally Posted by mehulrajput View Post
@epipath having a faster browser but unresponsive system is not what I want. Your values might increase browser benchmark at the expense of eating some other processes and reducing the multitasking.

I am not going to play around with the params as already ohmd is taking care of putting memory allocation for back ground processes. I believe putting this values is making cgroup of ohmd work (though I doubt that nokia engineers would have ignored this).

I would anyday prefer better multitasking compared to increase in browser processing javascript in some lesser milliseconds.
True. In fact, now with more responsiveness in multitasking, I open MORE browsers and to me, it's kinda showing better browsing experience, not necessarily better speed (of course if we could have BOTH, then there's no argument)... but how I use the phone is important too...

I like to open all my bookmarks (averagely 6 of them) and do something else while they load for a bit. So, it is extremely important to stay smooth while those are open. Eventually, they're going to load slow because there are so many browsers open but everything else that I do is not affected that greatly and after doodling with other things, ALL the browsers have loaded up!
__________________
[N900]
1000min 1000max @ ulv
PR1.3 with CSSU latest update
Malaysian N900 user!!!
 
Reply

Tags
autobrick, awesome-script, do no install, f***epitaph, install it now, perfect_ n900, script-a-brick, very safe


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:13.