| The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to HanzBlix For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
03-20-2012
, 12:24 AM
|
|
Posts: 153 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ New Zealand
|
#52
|
|
|
03-20-2012
, 11:25 AM
|
|
Posts: 112 |
Thanked: 43 times |
Joined on Mar 2012
|
#53
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to bnwg For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
03-30-2012
, 03:17 PM
|
|
Posts: 1,438 |
Thanked: 1,841 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
@ Edmonton, AB
|
#54
|
| The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to Creamy Goodness For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
03-31-2012
, 10:19 PM
|
|
Posts: 153 |
Thanked: 76 times |
Joined on Oct 2011
@ New Zealand
|
#55
|

| The Following User Says Thank You to HanzBlix For This Useful Post: | ||
![]() |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
Weird thing I found with rafael2k's idea, which is really appealing since it could be done on stock kernels, this /dev/kmem that we're missing and hence is stopping that route, well the reason /dev/kmem has been removed from most Linux distributions is because it's potentially a major security hole, for root kits specifically.
Trust google to have such shoddy security eh.
We really just need someone capable of doing custom kernels that actually believes in open source principles to release a kernel.