Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Dublin
#301
Originally Posted by Cue View Post
i.e a carriers worst nightmare.
Why?

If each OS is supported properly it shouldn't make a difference. Calls and texts will always be charged the same way.
__________________
stick a lightbulb up your arse.. that way when you bend over it will look like you've had a good idea
 
casketizer's Avatar
Posts: 566 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Lower Saxony
#302
Support Nightmare, and that times three.
__________________
Nokia N900 - Galaxy S3 - Galaxy Tab
 
Posts: 155 | Thanked: 166 times | Joined on Oct 2010 @ Dublin
#303
Originally Posted by casketizer View Post
Support Nightmare, and that times three.
That could be said for any carrier who has Android & Windows Phone in their product range
__________________
stick a lightbulb up your arse.. that way when you bend over it will look like you've had a good idea
 
Posts: 840 | Thanked: 823 times | Joined on Nov 2009
#304
Originally Posted by Faustino View Post
Why?

If each OS is supported properly it shouldn't make a difference. Calls and texts will always be charged the same way.
Mainly because they would be giving complete control to the OS developers and users if there were no restrictions on what can be installed, they wouldn't like that one bit. Also,they would much rather you buy another handset or renew for their exclusive new phone with its new OS. They would also have to provide support/settings for all handset/OS combinations not just different handsets. The required planning/coordination with both the manufacturers and OS developers would also be a nightmare for the carriers.
I guess if the carriers could control what OS choices and updates you had the option of installing then we might get something like this but I very much doubt they would go through all this trouble for such a thing.
 
danramos's Avatar
Posts: 4,672 | Thanked: 5,455 times | Joined on Jul 2008 @ Springfield, MA, USA
#305
Originally Posted by casketizer View Post
The limitation of the 32bit Windows Client to 4GB was indeed a design choice. The reason stated for this was legacy 32bit drivers not being compatible. (Source : Windows Internals 5th ed.)
Legacy 32-bit drivers for Windows (XP, Vista, 7), replaced by Windows 2008 32-bit drivers suddenly addressed FAR more than 4GB of RAM. Windows Internals was "technically" correct but ultimately giving the wrong impression, given replacing a single DLL fixes the problem.

Here's a good article write-up on PAE:
http://www.pallab.net/2009/12/30/ena...ndows-vista-7/

From the article:
"Microsoft claims that it is not their fault and is instead a limitation of the 32 bit architecture. At first glance this seems correct. 32 bit processor using 32 bit registers should be only able to address up to 4 GB of RAM (232 = 4G). However, this is not actually true. The main reason being a feature called Physical Address Extension (PAE).

PAE makes it possible to address more than 4 GB of memory using 32 bit registers, since the registers aren’t used to store the physical address. Instead, the registers store linear addresses, which are mapped to physical addresses using the page table. This feature has been available since the days of Intel Pentium Pro. In x86 processors additional address lines are provided so that up to 64 GB can be addressed when using the PAE mode. If you want to learn more about Windows memory addressing, go through Geoff Chappell’s notes.

Windows Vista and 7 have two kernels – one which doesn’t use PAE and one which does. They are NTOSKRNL.EXE and NTKRNLPA.EXE respectively. Both of them reside within the Windows/System32 directory. Can you guess which one you are using? If you have a modern machine, then chances are that Data Execution Prevention (DEP) is enabled in your system and in that case you are already using the kernel with PAE enabled."


And THIS is the company whose products and designs you want running on your phone? Heh.. no wonder why people are staying away.
__________________
Nokia's slogan shouldn't be the pedo-palmgrabbing image with the slogan, "Connecting People"... It should be one hand open pleadingly with another hand giving the middle finger and the more apt slogan, "Potential Unrealized." --DR

Last edited by danramos; 2012-04-23 at 03:47.
 
casketizer's Avatar
Posts: 566 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Lower Saxony
#306
There are a lot of old drivers that make Windows 32bit with PAE and more than 4GB bluescreen. To my eternal disgrace I even wrote on of them for a company that used to be the leader in NICs but is now forgotten.
That is why MS limited it. Even the dll and loader hacks don't help you with those drivers.
__________________
Nokia N900 - Galaxy S3 - Galaxy Tab
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#307
Apollo Nokia phones to be “amazing”

http://mynokiablog.com/2012/03/26/no...attan-updates/
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#308
Lumia 800 on China Telecom bestseller list....Wow:

http://mynokiablog.com/2012/04/20/no...t-seller-list/
 
Guest | Posts: n/a | Thanked: 0 times | Joined on
#309
And here is a reason why Windows phones may succeed in the US. Carriers want competition to iphone:

http://www.marke****ch.com/video/***...2-EEF903948C2E
 
casketizer's Avatar
Posts: 566 | Thanked: 282 times | Joined on Sep 2010 @ Lower Saxony
#310
Edit not working for you?
__________________
Nokia N900 - Galaxy S3 - Galaxy Tab
 
Reply

Tags
backdoors, buysomethinelse, danrantos, goodbye nokia, lumiadork, lumiaturd, nsa_cia_lumia, seasons in sun


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 18:22.