|
|
08-06-2009
, 03:40 AM
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,539 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#2
|
|
|
08-06-2009
, 06:21 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 2,514 |
Thanked: 6,571 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#3
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Jaffa For This Useful Post: | ||
|
|
08-06-2009
, 06:33 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 1,290 |
Thanked: 1,139 times |
Joined on Nov 2008
|
#4
|
|
|
08-06-2009
, 06:54 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 2,514 |
Thanked: 6,571 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#5
|
|
|
08-06-2009
, 07:04 AM
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,539 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#6
|
This isn't just a package search interface; it's integrated into the new QA process and Extras repositories.
PackRat doesn't have the maemo.org look & feel, and the code isn't open (AFAIK, but no-one asked you either)
Doesn't really help with the "making the QA interface look better to highlight the key information" problem, anyway.
PackRat - and Gronmayer - are addressing different problems. maemo.org/packages/ is going to be a key part of ensuring Extras' apps quality, and so ultimately getting Extras enabled out-of-the-box
|
|
08-06-2009
, 07:14 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 2,514 |
Thanked: 6,571 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#7
|
What PackRat does is scanning a repositor[y|ies] and presenting you with the listing of their contents. How you use that listing is completely up to you. You can add all kinds of information there.
|
|
08-06-2009
, 07:21 AM
|
|
Posts: 1,418 |
Thanked: 1,539 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#8
|
|
|
08-06-2009
, 07:46 AM
|
|
|
Super Moderator |
Posts: 1,605 |
Thanked: 1,594 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Southern California
|
#9
|
|
|
08-06-2009
, 09:31 AM
|
|
|
Posts: 2,514 |
Thanked: 6,571 times |
Joined on Mar 2008
@ UK
|
#10
|
Some of the design (afaik), is more than just CSS, though, and might need a little html tweaking as well.
![]() |
| Tags |
| css, help wanted, packages |
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
|
You can read more about it here: http://communitizer.blogspot.com/200...-packages.html
So far, however, there's been a focus on developing the features, rather than the UI. The community's got lots of fantastic designers in it: anyone got any ideas/CSS for how it could be improved? Even some basic things like compartmentalizing the information, and putting the main body on a white background would help, I think.
Andrew Flegg -- mailto:andrew@bleb.org | http://www.bleb.org