Reply
Thread Tools
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#91
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
I think he meant that there is a lot more room/space between the people in the US versus other countries. We're not as tightly packed together in the US as say... Britain or Hong Kong.
Yup... and if you find a chart that shows the mean distance between subscriber and cell tower, you may see that the number is quite large in these parts as well.

***
Originally Posted by fms View Post
The standard answer here is "screw them". You have got several nationwide GSM networks, use them, ignore proprietary stuff, and it will eventually die off.
Originally Posted by Me
The change to an un-subsidized phone for some would require an additional $400 up front... A $200 Early Termination Fee plus a $200 dollar premium for the equipment itself.
Well, what can I say? Either wait until the end of your contract or use any loophole you can find with Google.

You may be right fms, let the millions of iDEN and proprietary CDMA customers eat cake.

For the record... it doesn't bother me a dang bit. My employer/client has provided me with unlimited service and new handsets whenever I need them for the past 8 years. Any future employment contracts I sign will have the same provisions.

...but many millions of subscribers live pay check to pay check.

BTW, fms I find your "screw them" philosophy hard to relate to. Can you provide any examples of how this attitude has worked out for you or others in the past.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to YoDude For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#92
Originally Posted by gerbick View Post
I think he meant that there is a lot more room/space between the people in the US versus other countries. We're not as tightly packed together in the US as say... Britain or Hong Kong.
Russia. All GSM. No subsidies, no contracts, 18% VAT. Mostly pay-as-you-go calling. And it still ends up cheaper than in US.
 
Posts: 179 | Thanked: 1,679 times | Joined on Nov 2008 @ Helsinki
#93
Originally Posted by sachin007 View Post
Silence from both peter@maemomarketing and Ragnar, proves that this in fact is remotely true..... or is it not?
Wouldn't read too much into me not responding. In general, I don't comment on speculation of future devices.
 

The Following User Says Thank You to Peter@Maemo Marketing For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#94
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
BTW, fms I find your "screw them" philosophy hard to relate to. Can you provide any examples of how this attitude has worked out for you or others in the past.
Attitude worked beautifully for me over the past years. I do not have to deal with the Phone Company, because I have no DSL. I do not have to deal with the Cable Company, because I have no cable. I do not have to pay monthly fees to my Cell Service Provider, because I only pay for minutes/megabytes used and that comes to <$20/month. My web browser shows clean web pages (AdBlock+) and I avoid watching TV if I can (not making a cult of this though). If I do watch TV, there is a Chinese-made recorder letting me skip through ads.

Believe me, locking all these things out of your life makes perfect sense.
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fms For This Useful Post:
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#95
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Attitude worked beautifully for me over the past years. I do not have to deal with the Phone Company, because I have no DSL. I do not have to deal with the Cable Company, because I have no cable. I do not have to pay monthly fees to my Cell Service Provider, because I only pay for minutes/megabytes used and that comes to <$20/month. My web browser shows clean web pages (AdBlock+) and I avoid watching TV if I can (not making a cult of this though). If I do watch TV, there is a Chinese-made recorder letting me skip through ads.

Believe me, locking all these things out of your life makes perfect sense.
Well good for you...

To many, you live a life of luxury that few can realistically afford...

It is kind of like that age old dilemma; What came first, the liquor store or the run down neighborhood?

...and sort of back on topic. How come all that seems to be advertised in rundown neighborhoods is liquor?
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#96
Originally Posted by YoDude View Post
To many, you live a life of luxury that few can realistically afford...
Which of the above things can't you afford, aside maybe from having to have at least some Net connection (DSL or cable)?
 
YoDude's Avatar
Posts: 2,869 | Thanked: 1,784 times | Joined on Feb 2007 @ Po' Bo'. PA
#97
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Which of the above things can't you afford, aside maybe from having to have at least some Net connection (DSL or cable)?
OK... you win. This thread is now all about you and your point of view. Have fun.
 
Posts: 4,556 | Thanked: 1,624 times | Joined on Dec 2007
#98
Originally Posted by fms View Post
Russia. All GSM. No subsidies, no contracts, 18% VAT. Mostly pay-as-you-go calling. And it still ends up cheaper than in US.
I know this is a dated thread but. part of the problem is also just general concepts and ideas of how to run a country and how much influence the government should have.

I suspect for countries that are more socialist, it's more acceptable for the government to push telcos around. While if the same is done in the USA (if not carefully) tons of lawsuits are filed and advocacy groups are created. And the US being half foot in socialist, half foot in capitalist gets screwed on both halfs without the benefits of both.
__________________
Originally Posted by ysss View Post
They're maemo and MeeGo...

"Meamo!" sounds like what Zorro would say to catherine zeta jones... after she slaps him for looking at her dirtily...
 
Posts: 1,418 | Thanked: 1,541 times | Joined on Feb 2008
#99
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
I know this is a dated thread but. part of the problem is also just general concepts and ideas of how to run a country and how much influence the government should have.
This has nothing to do with how country is run. And, believe me, there is nothing "socialist" about Russia nowadays...
 
Jason404's Avatar
Posts: 70 | Thanked: 11 times | Joined on Sep 2009 @ London, UK
#100
Originally Posted by Laughing Man View Post
And the US being half foot in socialist, half foot in capitalist gets screwed on both halfs without the benefits of both.
Halves?? The US economy is more corporatist capitalist than any other country. Who were you comparing to? Historical fascist states?

/politics.. sorry.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 15:31.