|
2007-04-10
, 17:37
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#12
|
|
2007-04-10
, 18:47
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#13
|
I own two Newtons, and they are awesome. But HWR sucks for trying to use a terminal. And a keyboard like the Sidekick has is about the same speed as handwriting. So although I'm dying for Einstein to wind up running at a decent speed on this thing, I'd still like a keyboard.
|
2007-04-11
, 02:22
|
|
Posts: 643 |
Thanked: 628 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ Seattle (or thereabouts)
|
#14
|
I'm a touch-typist, so I'll gladly concede that I can type much faster than I can write -- on a normally-sized keyboard, that is. Even on my Psion 5mx I couldn't type all that fast and on that keyboard it was actually marginally possible to touch-type (but never for long, because the key placement was just that bit off to what I was used to, that I couldn't help myself from peeking).
I have used lots of thumbboards, most extensively the ones on my Treo 270 and subsequently my SE P910. The biggest problem with thumbboards is that it is impossible to type blindly: You always have to keep your eyes on the thumbboard to see what you are tapping at, and in doing so you lose contact with your text. The virtual thumbboard on the 770/N800 is actually rather good in that respect, but only because it leaves just a tiny amount of screen realestate, which is easy to find. Still, try to tap and look at your text at the same time. I dare you...
I consider that the biggest advantage of full-screen handwriting recognition: You keep eye contact with your text at all times, just as you would with real, oldfashioned pen-and-paper handwriting. For me, the trade-off in speed is more than made up by the inherent focus this input method offers. That is why your comparison to the Grafitti-like character recognition is flawed: Grafitti (and its likes) are basically thumbboards without keys.
I've said here before (ad nauseam, to some) that I'm a Newton user of old. In fact, for almost five years, a MessagePad 2100 was more or less my main computer for on the road. I own a keyboard for the Newton (and with the carrying case it actually almost resembled a mini-laptop), but I've used it only a handful of times. For an entire year, I brought my MessagePad to weekly (often dayly) meetings in a major restauration project and took minutes for those meetings. I was faster in handwriting than the guy with the laptop and usually more accurate, mainly because the Newton has such an amazing handwriting recognition system.
The really sad thing is that the Newtons HWR still exists: PhatWare sells it as Calligrapher and PenOffice -- for f**king Windows only!! All they have to do is port it to Linux (and Maemo, obviously) and noone will ever ask for a thumbboard again (not entirely true: even on the Newton boards there is the occasional deluded individual who wants a thumbboard. They are usually properly chastised for doing so )
Oh, BTW, I also used my Newton on the train, without keyboard. I actually wrote entire articles on the train.
|
2007-04-11
, 06:57
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#15
|
|
2007-04-11
, 07:09
|
Posts: 147 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Jan 2007
|
#16
|
|
2007-04-11
, 07:23
|
Posts: 751 |
Thanked: 522 times |
Joined on Mar 2007
@ East Gowanus
|
#17
|
|
2007-04-11
, 07:49
|
Posts: 92 |
Thanked: 2 times |
Joined on Feb 2007
@ Toulouse, France
|
#18
|
I'm a touch-typist, so I'll gladly concede that I can type much faster than I can write -- on a normally-sized keyboard, that is.
|
2007-04-11
, 09:43
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#19
|
I have a XP tablet and the HWR is actually really good, my handwriting is pretty decent. I haven't tried to train the handwriting on N800 but I don't really want to. HWR tech needs to recognize whole words, not just letters. If you could do whole words, inline Newton style this device would just rock even harder than it does already.
|
2007-04-11
, 09:47
|
|
Posts: 3,220 |
Thanked: 326 times |
Joined on Oct 2005
@ "Almost there!" (Monte Christo, Count of)
|
#20
|
I'm afraid I missed out on the Newton. I was on the point of buying an eMate at one stage but it would have stretched my budget just a little too far at the time. Then Steve Jobs returned to save his old company and decreed that they needed to simplify their product line. Encore raté, as my nephew says.
But to get back on topic; the thumb board on the beastie is very much more usable than any of the input methods on Marvin, and I am more than twice as fast with the thumb board. And it's a relatively small one.
The downside of a thumb board for Marvin would be it necessarily would make him thicker and heavier and more expensive. Probably not on par with an OQO, but close. I'm thinking that now that the OQO model 02 is out, the Model 01 plus might just be approaching the price of an N800 soon. And there's a whole forum over at oqotalk.com about running Linux on it. Hmmmm ...