Active Topics
-
Porting apps to Leste (29)
to Maemo 7 / Leste by Arno_11 - 2 days, 8 hrs ago -
Install Fonts in N900 (68)
to Maemo 5 / Fremantle by teroyk - 3 days, 11 hrs ago - more...
|
gerbick
|
2010-06-10
, 21:24
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#1
|
Released today...
And still no mention of Maemo. I think I'll stop hoping for it in Maemo, turn my hopes to MeeGo. Which... for me isn't exactly a bad thing.
|
2010-06-10
, 21:30
|
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ France
|
#2
|
Link? I only see the pre-releases available on Adobe's website, announced on 2nd June.
|
|
2010-06-10
, 21:31
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#3
|
|
|
2010-06-10
, 21:44
|
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ France
|
#4
|
Meh, their own servers aren't up yet.
Thanks for the link though.
The requested URL /pub/flashplayer/updaters/10/flash_player_update_201006_flash10.zip was not found on this server.
|
|
2010-06-10
, 22:03
|
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#5
|
Weird. I'm running the debugger version without issue right now.
|
|
2010-06-11
, 04:17
|
|
Posts: 85 |
Thanked: 383 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Hong Kong
|
#6
|
Originally Posted by gerbick
Neither MeeGo is mentioned in Adobe's official System Requirements:
Released today...
And still no mention of Maemo. I think I'll stop hoping for it in Maemo, turn my hopes to MeeGo. Which... for me isn't exactly a bad thing.
http://www.adobe.com/products/flashp...emreqs/#mobile
|
|
2010-06-11
, 05:15
|
|
Posts: 619 |
Thanked: 691 times |
Joined on Feb 2010
|
#7
|
>> Neither MeeGo is mentioned in Adobe's official System Requirements:
This is a bit different, Meego has not been released in a substantial functioning format so Adobe cannot really commit at this stage.
Maemo 5 is another story of course. Its absence tells us all we need to know.
This is a bit different, Meego has not been released in a substantial functioning format so Adobe cannot really commit at this stage.
Maemo 5 is another story of course. Its absence tells us all we need to know.
|
|
2010-06-11
, 05:22
|
|
Posts: 96 |
Thanked: 25 times |
Joined on Apr 2010
@ India
|
#8
|
Simple queries....Why is Adobe flash not considered fit to be running on iOS and Ok to be running in MAC OS?
Also would webOS see another phone ? Heard HP wasnt keen on the handset business.
Also would webOS see another phone ? Heard HP wasnt keen on the handset business.
|
|
2010-06-11
, 08:04
|
|
Posts: 336 |
Thanked: 610 times |
Joined on Apr 2008
@ France
|
#9
|
Originally Posted by rcarlos
Flash has been running on Mac OS for quite some time now. You're referring to iOS (which used to stand for iPhone OS).
Simple queries....Why is Adobe flash not considered fit to be running on iOS and Ok to be running in MAC OS?
Also would webOS see another phone ? Heard HP wasnt keen on the handset business.
Also, we've already discussed Apple's decisions in very much detail in the past. No need to go there again.
 |
|
2010-06-11
, 10:59
|
|
Posts: 762 |
Thanked: 395 times |
Joined on Jan 2010
@ Helsinki
|
#10
|
Could there be a workaround to get this working on Maemo? I mean if Flash 10.1 would happen to come in a .deb installation package...? 