Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 1,082 | Thanked: 1,235 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#1
http://news.cnet.com/8301-13924_3-20026354-64.html
http://armdevices.net/2010/12/22/mic...or-arm-at-ces/
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB1000...605593000.html
Could this pose a true threat to Arm Linux? Could this also leave Intel in the dust as Arm get more performance for price and power consumption ratio.
 
Posts: 1,082 | Thanked: 1,235 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#2
This could be potentially be very huge it gets rid of Intel's one true advantage in the market place.
 
JohnLF's Avatar
Posts: 551 | Thanked: 507 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ North West England
#3
...and of course it opens up the possibility of lots of ARM packages for WINE...
__________________
My websites: -
http://www.lefebvre.org.uk
http://www.lefebvre.ltd.uk
 

The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to JohnLF For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,082 | Thanked: 1,235 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#4
Originally Posted by JohnLF View Post
...and of course it opens up the possibility of lots of ARM packages for WINE...
True that
 
Kangal's Avatar
Posts: 1,789 | Thanked: 1,699 times | Joined on Mar 2010
#5
It might be waiting for MeeGo to see how they would do it.

Once they solve the age old dilemma:
(cross compatability, decent speed, limited/no fragmentation, with tools to make easy programs and bypass the political bs)
... Win 8 could be the new windows for 3 consecutive terms (ie Win9 and Win10 could potentially be minor upgrades).

I hope to see Dual 2GHz Cortex A9 (28nm) silicon with SGX543MP8 GPU matched with 2GB RAM, 256GB SSD, beautiful displays and plethora of sub-units (dsp, usbhost, hdmi out, bluray, phone, 3G, gps, compass, light detector, cameras etc) ... using (full desktop) Windows!
 

The Following 5 Users Say Thank You to Kangal For This Useful Post:
Posts: 1,082 | Thanked: 1,235 times | Joined on Apr 2010
#6
Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
It might be waiting for MeeGo to see how they would do it.

Once they solve the age old dilemma:
(cross compatability, decent speed, limited/no fragmentation, with tools to make easy programs and bypass the political bs)
... Win 8 could be the new windows for 3 consecutive terms (ie Win9 and Win10 could potentially be minor upgrades).

I hope to see Dual 2GHz Cortex A9 (28nm) silicon with SGX543MP8 GPU matched with 2GB RAM, 256GB SSD, beautiful displays and plethora of sub-units (dsp, usbhost, hdmi out, bluray, phone, 3G, gps, compass, light detector, cameras etc) ... using (full desktop) Windows!
Yah lets hope Windows on Arm is the real deal not a cheesy mobile version like Windows Ce. With Windows on ARM average people will finally want a Arm powered laptop.
 
Posts: 1,746 | Thanked: 2,100 times | Joined on Sep 2009
#7
Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
It might be waiting for MeeGo to see how they would do it.
The way they plan on doing it now: push everyone towards .NET and make everything managed code. JIT takes care of the platform specific bits.

That said, if they plan to use this on anything but ARM-based "desktops" and don't update the UI for small screen netbooks and tablets, they're screwed.
 
Posts: 303 | Thanked: 146 times | Joined on Aug 2009
#8
Windows is meaningless without the huge collection of x86 software.
How many older programs are going to be ported for ARM?
 

The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Radu For This Useful Post:
efekt's Avatar
Posts: 422 | Thanked: 320 times | Joined on Oct 2009 @ Israel
#9
Originally Posted by Kangal View Post
I hope to see Dual 2GHz Cortex A9 (28nm) silicon with SGX543MP8 GPU matched with 2GB RAM, 256GB SSD, beautiful displays and plethora of sub-units (dsp, usbhost, hdmi out, bluray, phone, 3G, gps, compass, light detector, cameras etc) ... using (full desktop) Windows!
Errr dude, just buy a laptop (and if you want insane specs, buy an Alienware)
__________________
As long as people will accept crap, it will be financially profitable to dispense it...
 

The Following User Says Thank You to efekt For This Useful Post:
Posts: 3,319 | Thanked: 5,610 times | Joined on Aug 2008 @ Finland
#10
Originally Posted by wmarone View Post
The way they plan on doing it now: push everyone towards .NET and make everything managed code. JIT takes care of the platform specific bits.

That said, if they plan to use this on anything but ARM-based "desktops" and don't update the UI for small screen netbooks and tablets, they're screwed.
The problem is .NET won't solve the problem - there are tons of widely used legacy libraries/applications that are not 100% .NET (and often containing 3rd party binary blobs or DLLs that need to trickle down first) so it will take several years to migrate to such a setup.

Not to mention the massive confusion which would hurt MS real bad - imagine you have a certain version of Photoshop or AutoCAD you paid serious money for. Would you expect that suddenly you need to take care WHAT edition of windows do you have to run a certain application ? One of the reasons cited for the relatively small Linux netbook market share is that people wanted their existing/familiar apps and layout. Sure, the next major versions of those might support ARM but that won't help your existing software, and MS can't force 3rd party companies to upgrade you to the ARM version for free.

So the bottom line is - it's not Microsoft per se that is the barrier to ARM, but the application ecosystem that was nurtured in the (near) eternal backward-compatibility promise.
__________________
Blogging about mobile linux - The Penguin Moves!
Maintainer of PyQt (see introduction and docs), AppWatch, QuickBrownFox, etc
 
Reply

Tags
die ms die, microfail


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 23:05.