Poll: Which mobile to replace n900 (due to lack of stock of n900 on insurer part)
Poll Options
Which mobile to replace n900 (due to lack of stock of n900 on insurer part)

Reply
Thread Tools
Posts: 961 | Thanked: 565 times | Joined on Jul 2007 @ Tyneside, North East England
#11
depends what you use your phone for.

n8 has the best hardware specs by far and software will get better - if you can live without a physical keyboard it's possibly the best. ui is a lttle tired but will be getting a makeover later this year apparantly. it has usb otg so you could plug a keyboard in.

camera and video is awesome for a phone, music is also pretty good except for album art. the hdmi out if you install nokia big screen is terrific.

blackberries are crap except as an email device.

desire z ok, but crap camera and hinge and general build seems a bit fragile.

getting the most expensive, flogging it and buying a N900 would be a decent idea also.
__________________
______________________________

Nokia 770 (2gb) since Aug 2007
Nokia N800 (32gb) since Dec 2007
Nokia N810 (16gb) since Sep 2009
Nokia N900 (64gb) since Aug 2010 ______________________________
 

The Following User Says Thank You to gazza_d For This Useful Post:
Posts: 179 | Thanked: 99 times | Joined on Feb 2010 @ Yorkshire, UK
#12
http://www.reghardware.com/2011/01/2..._htc_desire_z/
Of the bunch you probably want the desire Z, it beats the N900 on CPU and has similar spec overall. You won't feel the need to overclock your phone to get it to perform as it should. And isn't Nokia, which is nice.

http://www.reghardware.com/2011/01/2..._htc_7_trophy/
Windows phone 7 is awful, and sales numbers are almost as bad as the N900, not to mention the lack of functionality and general apps. (cut and paste is coming soon) Read up on it before you buy, no customisation, you have to have their apps, you can't run your own, you can't do what you want to the phone (like backgrounds etc)

N8 is another Nokia phone so I am bias against it and it is an old OS.

Blackberry's are good phones but are for business, they are not casual and social phones, little customisation and very limited in what they can do beyond their work role.
__________________
They say: Once bitten, twice shy.
I say: After the N900, never buying nokia.

Anti-Nokia Ambassador
 
Switch_'s Avatar
Posts: 601 | Thanked: 549 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Redditch, UK
#13
my mate just got an upgrade to a Desire Z which he stuck on eBay, it finally went for GBP £404. Do the maths. Second hand N900 times 2.
__________________
---<|| Alt + F4 for GOD MODE ||>---
---<|| Deviant Art Linky Linky ||>---
 
volt's Avatar
Posts: 1,309 | Thanked: 1,187 times | Joined on Nov 2008
#14
Qt-centric Symbian^3 is hardly an old OS. It's based on an old OS. As is OS/X, Windows 7 and all Linux variants. Symbian^3 is hardly out of beta yet. They haven't even received their to-be net browser yet.
 
Posts: 208 | Thanked: 91 times | Joined on Jun 2010
#15
I'd join the Android band wagon, the only thing you will really lose is the community
 
Posts: 411 | Thanked: 195 times | Joined on May 2010 @ Cambridge, UK
#16
Originally Posted by epitaph View Post
Blackberry coz it's serious bussiness! And u get a keyboard too!
Ha! Blackberries are useful if you want to remember what phones used to be capable of in 2007...

Another vote for 'buy the one that sells for most on ebay and get a secondhand n900' from me
 
Posts: 284 | Thanked: 74 times | Joined on Mar 2010 @ Wigan, UK
#17
You should have a poll on the thread.

Anyway - my vote goes with "get the most expensive, sell, buy, welcomed back to the community, enjoyment" option.
 
Posts: 380 | Thanked: 459 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Slovenia
#18
I'd go for second hand n900 but if i had to buy a NEW phone, i'd go for the n8, it really impressed me.
 
mikec's Avatar
Posts: 1,366 | Thanked: 1,185 times | Joined on Jan 2006
#19
I have an N8 for my work phone now, and it just gets better and better. Qt support is there and plenty of nice apps, and most importantly its got a working mail for exchange with full provisioning support.

HDMI, usb OTG , great battery life, opera and swype plus great cam and vids are just a bonus.

==but then I've still got my N900 ===
__________________
N900_Email_Options Wiki Page

Last edited by mikec; 2011-01-26 at 16:17.
 
Posts: 282 | Thanked: 337 times | Joined on Dec 2009 @ Austin, TX, USA
#20
I say get the N8 if you do any qt or qml stuff, or if you just like Nokia (of all the brands I have owned, they have consistently been the best quality hardware and best sounding phones--including the N900). Too bad the E7 is not available, or that might be an option for you.

If the upcoming Symbian update is any good, symbian will be comparable to android. They have to get rid of the lagginess in the UI, and perhaps make it look a little fancier, but Symbian, Android, and iOS are all in the same mold as phones-you-install-apps-on. Maemo (and hopefuly Meego) are another class of phones-that-are-also-general-purpose-computers. Android has more apps, but every time I read a list of "must have" apps for android I don't feel like I must have any of them. In fact, most people I know that have android or apple phones do little more than texting and playing angry birds. And Qt (especially with the mobility and qml components) is a VERY powerful platform for development and has the potential to deliver better apps than you will find on other phones, though it is not guaranteed that anyone will deliver these apps.

N8 gives you a better piece of hardware and a nice camera. It is a gamble whether Nokia will get it together with Symbian (I think they will, but others are more pessimistic), but in the end I would pick N8 just because I like having something different than everyone else I see.
 
Reply


 
Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:38.