gerbick
|
2008-01-22
, 07:29
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#101
|
![]() |
2008-01-22
, 11:21
|
|
Posts: 5,478 |
Thanked: 5,222 times |
Joined on Jan 2006
@ St. Petersburg, FL
|
#102
|
The Following User Says Thank You to GeneralAntilles For This Useful Post: | ||
|
2008-01-22
, 17:57
|
Guest |
Posts: n/a |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on
|
#103
|
![]() |
2008-02-20
, 06:15
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ San Jose, CA
|
#104
|
![]() |
2008-02-25
, 17:10
|
Posts: 177 |
Thanked: 128 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ Espoo, Finland
|
#105
|
![]() |
2008-03-01
, 21:54
|
Posts: 157 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#106
|
![]() |
2008-03-09
, 10:47
|
Posts: 95 |
Thanked: 5 times |
Joined on Feb 2008
|
#107
|
![]() |
2008-03-09
, 11:02
|
Posts: 1 |
Thanked: 0 times |
Joined on Sep 2007
|
#108
|
![]() |
2008-03-09
, 19:15
|
Posts: 157 |
Thanked: 16 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
|
#109
|
I've been using Modest for a while and I'm quite impressed.
Currently I'm experimenting with the IMAP-IDLE feature. My mailserver supports it and it works flawlessy in Modest when its open. The noftification for new email comes instantly.
But this does not seem so work when Modest is closed and running in the background.
Can anyone confirm this behaviour?
Thanks and Regards...
softcat
![]() |
2008-03-11
, 18:32
|
Posts: 56 |
Thanked: 3 times |
Joined on Jan 2008
@ San Jose, CA
|
#110
|